Krea University Faculty Receive Prestigious Ramnath Goenka Award for Environment Journalism

Krea University Faculty Receive Prestigious Ramnath Goenka Award for Environment Journalism

Sri City, January 6, 2022: Prof. Aniket Aga (Associate Professor of Anthropology & Environmental Studies) and Prof. Chitrangada Choudhury (Associate Professor of Practice in Environmental Studies & Public Policy) from Krea University have won the Ramnath Goenka Award for Excellence in Journalism in the ‘Environment, Science and Technology’ category. The Awards aim to celebrate excellence, courage and commitment, showcasing outstanding contributions every year.

This prestigious annual event in the Indian media calendar pays tribute to Print, Digital and Broadcast journalists who maintain the highest standards of their profession despite political and economic pressures, and who produce work that generates and sustains public trust in the media and impacts the lives of people.  The award in the ‘Environment’ category acknowledges exceptional contributions to public awareness and understanding of environmental issues, science and technology.  

Prof. Aga and Prof. Choudhury had reported two articles on illegal herbicide-tolerant GM cotton seeds and an associated complex of lethal chemical inputs like glyphosate which are sweeping through biodiversity-rich Adivasi farms of Odisha’s Eastern Ghats, radically altering a fragile ecology, and food and knowledge systems. Their two stories titled ‘Sowing the seeds of climate crisis in Odisha’ and ‘Cotton has now become a headache’ along with a broader climate change series published by the People’s Archive of Rural India (PARI), were named for the award. 

Prof. Aniket Aga is interested in science and technology studies, democratic politics, and agrarian studies, and works on questions of environmental justice, food democracy and sustainable agriculture. His first book ‘Genetically Modified Democracy’ examining the ongoing controversy over genetically modified (GM) food crops in India is recently out from Yale University Press & will be published in South Asia in early 2022 by Orient Blackswan. He is especially keen to work with students from disadvantaged groups, including Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi students and students from rural backgrounds.

Prof. Chitrangada Choudhury is a multimedia journalist and researcher. Her reportage on the environment, social justice and rural, in particular indigenous communities, has been cited for multiple awards including the Sanskriti Award (2008), the Press Council of India’s National Award for Investigative Reporting (2015), and the Lorenzo Natali Journalism Prize twice (2010 & 2018). She is a Founding member of The People’s Archive of Rural India, an Editorial Board member of Article 14, and a Senior Research Associate at the Centre for World Environment History, University of Sussex.

Featured In the media
India Education Diary
Prittle Prattle News
Business News This Week
Media Bulletins
Digital Media 9
APN News
IPM News
Online Media Cafe
Sakshi Post

How we should equip ourselves to thrive under high uncertainty

One of the interesting things about the New Year greetings that I received was that several of them prayed and wished for less uncertainty this year. Uncertainty is a given, at all times. Its degree and depth vary. After the financial crisis of 2008, uncertainty rose a notch higher. The pandemic and global response to it have pushed it several notches higher. Hence, the last column I wrote in Mint for 2021 conceded that the only certainty for the coming years was greater uncertainty.

Recently, Politico profiled Thomas Hoenig, former governor of the US Federal Reserve and his prescient warnings about the consequences of unconventional monetary policies that began to be pursued by the Fed under Ben Bernanke in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. The article is worth reading. The important thing to remember on finishing it, though, is that the story remains unfinished.

Therefore, the prayers and wishes for more predictability and less uncertainty should be tempered with realism. I am reminded of the story of James Stockdale, a Vietnam War Veteran. He was interviewed by Jim Collins, the author of many books, most notably, Good to Great. Stockdale had survived severe punishment and torture while being a prisoner of war in Vietnam. He was awarded the highest Presidential award in the US for bravery. When asked a question on who did not survive torture and imprisonment, he answered pithily: “Optimists.” Optimistic captives were wishful that their ordeal would end shortly, before Thanksgiving, before Christmas, etc, and when all these dates came and went without an end to their suffering, some lost heart and hope.

What Stockdale had told Jim Collins about the secret of his survival became famous as the ‘Stockdale Paradox’. The paradox is this: “Never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end—which you can never afford to lose—with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.”

As things stand, we would need to remember and practice this lesson for the better part of this decade. Hoping for an end to uncertainty is not wrong, but one should be clear-headed about its prospects. The covid pandemic and its handling are not the only variables to contend with. There is also uncertainty associated with the green transition. There is also the aggressive pursuit of geopolitical goals by nations. Therefore, we may have to learn to live with it.

What else could we—especially those who are influential decision-makers in various spheres—do to deal with this uncertainty, besides imbibing and implementing the Stockdale paradox?

First, one has to be open to many different ideas, even unconventional ones. Conceptual clarity has to be supplemented with contextual understanding. For subordinates, workers and colleagues to come forward with ideas, we could do many things. But one that stayed with me was what Jim Collins wrote about great leaders. They looked through the window to the outside world when they had to attribute success and looked at the mirror when they had to attribute failure. The most glorious example of this was a letter that Dwight Eisenhower wrote and did not have to release. As America’s top military commander during World War II (about a decade before he was elected president), he had prepared a statement to share with the US public if the landing of Allied forces at Normandy beach in France had failed. In it, he had praised the valour of soldiers and leadership of commanders, and also taken full responsibility for the failure of the mission.

Just as faith and realism were key ingredients for outlasting tough times, a combination of humility and confidence were the hallmarks of successful leadership, as Jim Collins documents in his book. During uncertain times, one has to build buffers. In fact, that is what many businesses did during the pandemic. Globally, diversifying and securing supply chains were considered both urgent and important. However, although many businesses had planned to relocate their facilities away from China or re-shore them, most of those plans remained unrealized well into 2021. What they did for supply-chain resilience, instead, was to build up inventories and create more inventory-carrying capacity, physically and financially.

While the law of unintended consequences is as ubiquitous as Murphy’s Law, uncertain times confer on it a particular advantage. Therefore, one has to be flexible enough—intellectually, above all—to reverse course or abandon a chosen path. Plans with lower-cost or costless exit options are considerably more preferable than irrevocable ones.

Uncertain times offer us an ideal breeding ground for creative thinking. The need for flexibility creates room for inventiveness in approaches. Charles Duhigg, in The Power of Habit, offers a revealing illustration. Paul O’ Neill traced the cause of infant mortality in the US all the way to teacher training in high schools.

One of the most difficult periods in American history was the Great Depression of the 1930s. But much creative progress happened in that period. Even today, our responses to difficult times will shape the durability and depth of our success in easier times.

V. Anantha Nageswaran is visiting distinguished professor of economics at Krea University. These are the author’s personal views.

Tribute | Bell hooks: Feminist, sister, ally

Her writings on love and abandonment, rage and justice, feminism and healing, struck a chord with us all

The last couple of years will be remembered for the incredible void it created — individual and collective, personal and political, spectacular and ordinary. But nothing prepared us for the untimely death of bell hooks (Gloria Jean Watkins), author, teacher, professor, feminist, and a black woman who made it count in white supremacist America. hooks was remarkable — she insisted on writing her name in lower case, something that I found hard to explain to the editors of my book when they insisted on standardisation. Some women refuse to be standardised, even by multi-million dollar publishing houses, and hooks was one of them.

Her writings resonated across the globe, reaching the farthest corners, in a voice that was distinctly black and overwhelmingly woman. She wrote of love, justice, feminism, teaching, living, politics, and mounted a scathing criticism of white liberal feminism, holding those in power accountable to those they claim to represent, or erase. She hammered the last nail in the coffin of universal sisterhood when she wrote: “Privileged-class white women swiftly declared their “ownership” of the movement, placing working-class white women, poor white women, and all women of color in the position of followers.”

Electrifying hooks

What was it about hooks that gave her such a wide readership? If testimonies on social media are anything to go by, women of all age, location, space, read her, nodding in agreement, tearing up, and resolving to carry on as they found their lives written on those pages. Her writings on the possibilities of love and its abandonment, on rage and justice, on feminism and healing, struck a chord with us all — women facing patriarchal norms and disciplining, and paralysed by an inability to grasp the world. An inability that emerges from a bewilderment. A bewilderment that cannot comprehend a world that devalues traditional femininity and yet hates the deviant female. A world designed to exploit, extract and profit from the lives and labour of women.

For many, hooks was not just a powerful feminist writer, but also a sister and ally. In All About Love, she cajoled us into trying again, into loving again, urging us not to curl in but to open ourselves up to a world that recognises and respects vulnerabilities and differences. One can imagine the electrifying effect hooks has on young adults, particularly in India, growing up in patriarchal families that normalise violence and abuse as love and care, when she writes “…the intensity of our woundedness often leads to a closing of the heart, making it impossible for us to give or receive the love that is given to us.” She also teaches us that absence of justice makes love impossible and the absence of love is antithetical to justice. She urges us to forgive and to love again.

End to inequalities

In the past few decades, neo-liberal feminism has imagined a world strangely at odds with a vision of feminism that envisages a transformation in consciousness. While the former talks of inclusion of certain kinds of women in hegemonic structures, hooks’ brand of feminism calls for an end to caste, race, gender and sexuality-based inequalities that govern the ways we inhabit the world. Her searing critique of reformist feminism foregrounds how working-class racialised feminine labour formed the basis on which bourgeois (as well as white/ upper-caste) women secured a degree of freedom within the existing system for themselves.

For me and many feminist teachers/ practitioners, her book Teaching to Transgress left an indelible mark at the core of our beings. She taught us that critical pedagogy meant perceiving students as not receivers of compartmentalised knowledge but as seekers who “want an education that is healing to the uninformed, unknowing spirit. They do want knowledge that is meaningful.” She urged feminist teachers to make women’s studies classrooms a site of resistance, based on curriculums that do not reflect dominant ideologies but question them.

Her words never rang truer than in the current environment where women’s and gender studies programmes across the globe have taken a conservative turn, particularly in the global north where liberal feminism has allied with militaristic and supremacist ideologies by targeting Asian women, particularly Muslim women, as objects of feminist campaigning, thus strengthening neo-imperialism.

Radical classrooms

For her, the classroom was a space where marginalised students would speak of their experience of theory, practice and politics. And she declared it was these utterances that frightened teachers who continue to perceive students as mere consumers of knowledge. She wrote, “Many professors have conveyed to me their feeling that the classroom should be a “safe” place; that usually translates to mean that the professor lectures to a group of quiet students who respond only when they are called on.”

In India (as much elsewhere), where academic institutions are central to reproducing inequalities rather than dismantling them, education has always been a pathway to producing good workers and citizens. It ensures that the middle-class and/ or upper-caste continues to take advantage of the social and cultural capital granted to them through inter-generational privileges. Her statement that “the classroom remains the most radical space of possibility in the academy” has inspired many feminist scholars and teachers (including me) not to quit academics, even when our spirits were broken by the systemic sexism, casteism and homophobia rampant in our universities.

As feminist teachers and practitioners, we remain indebted to hooks, for she has taught us that the goal of transformative pedagogy is to create a democratic classroom where everyone takes ownership of learning, where everyone is an agent. hooks has given us, a whole generation of feminist teachers and educators, a language — to express, to resist and to transform.

The writer teaches anthropology and gender studies at Krea University, Sri City.

Industry and Academia come together to open minds of young students at Krea Career Dialogues 2021

The day-long virtual event featured 4 panel discussions, exploring various Careers in Psychology; Sustainability; Arts, Media & Sport; Analytics

Chennai, December 21, 2021: Krea University hosted their flagship event “Career Dialogues”, which brought together over 20 speakers from industry and academia on one platform. The day-long virtual event featured 4 panel discussions, exploring various Careers in Psychology; Sustainability; Arts, Media & Sport; Analytics. The aim of the event is to open the minds of young school students about future careers across multiple industry verticals.

Career Dialogues 2021 kicked off with two spectacular key note addresses, by Mr Anurag Malik, Partner – People Advisory Services at Ernst & Young and Ms Neerja Birla, Founder & Chairperson – Aditya Birla Education Trust. In his address, Mr Malik emphasised “Interwoven Careers is the future…The new-age student who sees himself or herself as a professional in the years to come should be ready for the change, as companies are today taking a 360-degree view on skills.” Addressing the exam time and academic stress that students face, Ms Birla said, “While it is important to do well academically, it’s equally essential to remember that grades don’t define a student.”

Each panel discussion that followed, brought multiple facets of each subject. The conversation on psychology covered Criminal, Sports, Counselling and Clinical aspects of the practice. The discussion on Sustainability hosted practitioners and academics from across Conservation, Sustainability, Economics of Environment and Climate Change. Spinning a different track, the next panel highlighted Arts Managements, Sports Media, and emerging Media technology. In the Analytics panel, experts from Media, Marketing, Financial Risk and Behavioural analytics shared their insights.

20+ speakers representing leading organisations like Tiger Analytics, McKinsey & Co, The World Bank, Centre for Wildlife Studies, Foreseti Consulting, Sony Sports, ArtSpire and many more, shared their insights on future trends in their area of work and shed light on the kind of skills industry will demand from young graduates.

In his opening address, Mr. Ramkumar Ramamoorthy, Pro-Vice Chancellor of Professional Learning at Krea University, said, “Last year, the World Economic Forum came out with a listing of the top 10 skills that will be needed to align oneself to the new opportunities that will be presented in the post-pandemic world by various discipline and industry segments. These include analytical thinking, active learning, problem finding, problem solving, creativity, originality and initiative, technology use, monitoring and control, resilience, stress tolerance, reasoning ideation and flexibility.”

Career Dialogues, is an important endeavour by Krea University in partnership with industry, towards informing school leavers about their various career options, to encourage them to follow their interest, to allow them to apply look at the world of careers more laterally than as silo tracks.

When Scientists Used Machine Learning to Spot Bad Lines in 700 Bollywood Film

Hyderabad: There’s a line in the 2007 Bollywood film Jab We Met, starring Kareena Kapoor and Shahid Kapoor, that goes: “Akeli ladki khuli tijori ki tarah hoti hai” – Hindi for ‘A woman alone is like an open vault’. Another one, from the film Kambakkht Ishq (2009) starring Kareena Kapoor and Akshay Kumar, goes: “Marriage ke pehle ladkiyan sex objects hoti hai, aur marriage ke baad they object to sex!” (‘Women are sex objects before marriage, and they object to sex after marriage!’).

Bollywood is no stranger to such sexist and misogynistic dialogues. But a new analysis of 700 films produced by this part of the Indian movie industry suggests some of them may be making less frequent appearances on screen.

Bollywood plus other regional Indian movie industries constitute the world’s largest movie industry based on the number of feature films they produce. These movies target a large number of audiences worldwide and colossal revenues. Jab We Met, for example, raked in Rs 114 crore, and Kambakkht Ishq, Rs 129 crore.

In the new study, published online this month, researchers from the Rochester Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon University used natural-language processing (NLP) techniques to analyse subtitles from 70 years of Bollywood films and identified colorism, sexism and religious and geographical prejudices in each film.

The study, conducted by machine-learning researchers Kunal Khadilkar, Ashique KhudaBukhsh and Tom Mitchell, also compared results obtained from their analysis of Bollywood movies with several movies from Hollywood and other parts of the world for insights on how Bollywood fares on the global stage in terms of fair representation.

The results suggest that while Bollywood movies have been hosting offensive lines for a long time, things may be improving.

Why bother?

According to the study, Bollywood movies have a target audience of at least 1.2 billion people in 90 countries, so the views and stereotypes they contain prove influential and quickly.

Khadilkar and KhudaBukhsh told The Wire Science that the study was born at Carnegie Mellon University, where Khadilkar was a graduate student and KhudaBukhsh a visiting faculty member. They were both very interested in Bollywood affairs and had followed comments on the social media about the industry’s issues with representation, so they decided to undertake a large study that used their expertise in machine-learning.

According to KhudaBukhsh, they “wanted to see how popular entertainment captures social norms”, since “any improvement or degradation in Bollywood content can affect lots and lots of people”.

They began by collecting and organising the English subtitles of the 100 top-grossing Bollywood movies in each decade from 1950 through 2020.

To compare the trends they observed in Bollywood movies with the global picture, they also collected the subtitles of the 100 top-grossing Hollywood movies in each of the same decades and those of 150 movies nominated for the ‘Best International Feature Film Award’ at the Academy Awards – or Oscars – since 1970.

According to Khadilkar, this corpus itself was “unique” – reportedly the first of its kind.

Then, the duo classified the 70 years into three categories: “old” (1950-1969), “mid” (1970-1999) and “new” (2000-020). “Our choice of separation points in the timeline is guided by the global emergence of counter-culture in the late 60s and early 70s and the rapid rise of multiplex culture in Indian cinema,” they wrote in their study’s paper, and added that the periods could be sliced in other ways as well.

To find and quantify bias, Khadilkar and KhudaBukhsh used four methods.

First, they counted the number of times male and female pronouns occurred in the Bollywood films’ corpus, to check for gender bias.

Second, they used the ‘word embedding associated test’ (WEAT), a common measure that quantifies relationships between words. WEAT involves mapping words in a dataset as vectors in a “high-dimensional” space, and then quantifying the distance between these vectors as a measure of the relationship between them. The distance is computed as a score, commonly called the ‘WEAT score’, which goes from -1 to 1.

In the current study, 0 meant ‘no bias’, a positive score meant a bias towards men and a negative score meant a bias towards women.

Third, they checked whether the context in which certain words were being used in movies had changed. They did this using diachronic word embedding, in which they mapped the nearest “neighbours” of a particular word in a dynamic dataset in a similar high-dimensional space as in the previous method. For example, by tracking the nearest neighbours of the word “beautiful”, they could say whether the context in which “beautiful” was being used in movies had changed.

Also read: In Support of #MeToo, 11 Women Filmmakers Pledge to Never Work With Proven Offenders

Finally, Khadilkar and KhudaBukhsh used cloze tests – fill-in-the-blanks tasks that a program performs after ‘learning’ a large number of movie dialogues. How it filled the blanks could be used to deduce what biases it may have learnt along with the dialogues.

For example, after training their program, the researchers posed the following question: “A woman should be _ by occupation” and “A man should be _ by occupation”. If the program had said “a cleaner” and “an engineer”, the duo could infer that that’s what the dialogues had ‘taught’ the program.

In addition, the researchers also checked whether dialogues harboured biases about families’ preference for male children, fair skin and the dowry system, the occupations of Hindu versus Muslim characters, and representation of characters from different parts of India.

Radhika Mamidi, a computational linguist at the International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, commended the paper for using “correct and sound methodology”. But she also said “the data may not be representative enough” simply because “there are many more stereotypes portrayed in the movies which may not have found a place in the paper.”

Gender bias in Bollywood films

The authors found that considerable gender bias continues to persist in Bollywood movies, although Pritha Chakrabarti, a cultural studies researcher who has worked previously on representation in Bollywood1, pointed out an important caveat. As an illustration, she quoted a line from the movie Jab We Met that the study finds to be an example of misogyny: “A girl who is alone is like an open treasure” (translation from the paper).

According to her, “the movie is actually trying to challenge the dominant notions of patriarchy”, and “rather than preaching the bias, the movie is trying to expose the bias”.

This said, the researchers were quickly able to find the imprints of Bollywood’s representation problem in their data.

For example, by counting the occurrences of male versus female pronouns in their corpus, they concluded that both Bollywood and Hollywood movies are skewed towards the use of the male pronoun. Many of us may have already intuited this, but according to the study’s authors, their work’s value lies in, among other things, the size of their analysis and the quantification of various biases.

The WEAT scores also suggested that Bollywood movies had a bigger bias towards men compared to that of Hollywood movies – especially in the romance genre. But Hollywood movies scored worse on action films.

The results from the cloze tests indicated reason for some optimism: for a given occupation, the representation of women in both Bollywood and Hollywood movies has been improving over time – and more substantially in Bollywood. The authors attribute this to “the continual fight for gender equality in India”.

Chakrabarti said that this improvement could be a result of the “post-Nirbhaya moment” – referring to the 2012 Delhi gangrape incident. This incident, in her words, “inaugurated the stage in India about a more egalitarian view of women and their position in the society in popular culture”.

She also said that while there have been attempts before to change the way women are represented and addressed on the silver screen, they have still portrayed women as people in need of being “saved” or “respected”, but “never as an equal”.

The NLP researchers also found that there has been a considerable shift in the sex ratios of children born in movies. They wrote that the birth of a child is an important plot point in many Bollywood films, with one in every 10 films using the trope. And they found that whereas 74% of children born in the ‘old’ group were male, a relatively better 55% in the ‘new’ group were male.

Skin colour, dowry and caste

Bollywood also continues to have a pronounced bias towards fair skin (as do all other major regional filmmaking sectors in the country). According to the researchers, they performed a cloze test in which they asked the program: “A beautiful woman should have _ skin”, the most common response before training was “soft”. But after being fed a diet of Bollywood dialogues, it started to say “fair”.

And diachronic word embedding tests found that this fair-skin bias has been consistent across old, mid and new Bollywood movies.

However, the same tests also revealed that perception towards the dowry system had improved in the ‘new’ group. While “money” and “debt” were the words most commonly associated with “dowry” in the ‘old’ set, words such as “guts” and “refusal” featured closer to ‘dowry’ in newer ones.

The unevenness of improvements continued into the religious representation portion of the analysis.

The words most commonly associated with “Hindu” in older movies were “worshipped”, “loyal” and “righteous” – versus “industrialist”, “wealthy” and “respected” in the newer lot. And the words most commonly associated with “Muslim” changed from “urdu”, “sage”, “saint” and “scholar” to “shameless” and “traitor” between the same lots.

When the researchers compared the representation of various religious communities in movies with their numbers in the Indian population (per Census data), they observed that Muslims have been consistently underrepresented in Bollywood.

For example, only about 6% of all surnames indicated a Muslim character, while the Census data from the same time indicated that Muslims made up around 10% of the national population. The trend has reportedly continued into new Bollywood movies as well – 8% on screen, 14% off screen.

In similar vein, the researchers also noted that the caste and religious representation of people in the medical profession have been skewed heavily in favour of Hindu Brahmin men, reinforcing a well-documented casteist bias in the practice of medicine in India.

On geographic representation

By analysing the number of times a particular geographical region was mentioned in each movie, the researchers were also able to conclude that Mumbai and Delhi. This is not as surprising as the finding that the states of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram found no mention at all in the corpus of films.

The researchers also asked the program in cloze tests: “The biggest problem in India is ” and “The biggest problem in America is ”.

When the program was trained using the corpus of new Bollywood movies, it replied with “Pakistan” and “Kashmir” to the former query. When trained on Hollywood dialogues, it answered with “racism” for the latter. The researchers wrote in their paper that such answers could be a useful way to extract information about national priorities, at least as portrayed in popular culture.

Also read: Does Not Compute: Why Machines Need a Practical Sense of Humor

Quantifying bias

The researchers acknowledged that although most of their insights were not novel – in the sense that they have been discussed in qualitative social science research for some time – they have been able to scale their analysis to a large number of movies and were able to quantify the bias.

“Now, we have a proper number associated with each of the biases – with the gender disparity in dialogues, how dowry is represented in films, how babies born in films are predominantly sons, etc.,” Khadilkar told The Wire Science.

According to KhudaBukhsh, the quantitative nature of their study provides a tool with which to understand the sort of biases that have persisted in Bollywood movies and could now allow others to track how their presence changes over time.

At the same time, Chakrabarti cautioned against waiting for data to believe something when evidence of it is already common. “We don’t need to go from door to door to do a survey to prove that we live in a patriarchal society,” she said. “Similarly, we don’t need to get data out of hundreds of films to say that there is a sexist bias in the language used in cinema.”

KhudaBukhsh replied, “We don’t see our work as a competition to what social scientists do. In terms of research questions, I still feel that social scientists will have more meaningful research questions and more insightful understanding of the results that we found.” Instead, he added, their work could be “a tool to help social scientists scale their work to a much larger number of movies. Our work complements the contributions of social scientists.”

Going ahead, Khadilkar and KhudaBukhsh plan to apply their techniques to other texts, including radio transcripts and books, in the hope that their work will start conversations both within and outside Bollywood about representation, while supporting the work of social scientists. Chakrabarti herself had a wish: “I think it would be interesting to see what happens when the machine learns sarcasm.”

Sayantan Datta (they/them) are a queer-trans science writer, communicator and journalist. They currently work with the feminist multimedia science collective TheLifeofScience.com, and tweet at @queersprings.

She also teaches at Krea University, where the author are also a faculty member

Industry and Academia come together for Krea University ‘Career Dialogues 2021’

Sri City, December 21, 2021: Krea University hosted their flagship event “Career Dialogues”, which brought together over 20 speakers from industry and academia on one platform.

The day-long virtual event featured 4 panel discussions exploring various Careers in Psychology; Sustainability; Arts, Media & Sport; Analytics. The aim of the event was to open the minds of young school students about future careers across multiple industry verticals.

Career Dialogues 2021 kicked off with two spectacular keynote addresses, by Mr Anurag MalikPartner – People Advisory Services at Ernst & Young and Ms Neerja BirlaFounder & Chairperson – Aditya Birla Education Trust.

In his address, Mr Malik emphasised “Interwoven Careers is the future…The new-age student who sees himself or herself as a professional in the years to come should be ready for the change, as companies are today taking a 360-degree view on skills.”

Addressing the exam time and academic stress that students face, Ms Birla said, “While it is important to do well academically, it’s equally essential to remember that grades don’t define a student.”

Each panel discussion that followed, brought multiple facets of each subject. The conversation on psychology covered Criminal, Sports, Counselling and Clinical aspects of the practice. The discussion on Sustainability hosted practitioners and academics from across Conservation, Sustainability, Economics of Environment and Climate Change. Spinning a different track, the next panel highlighted Arts Managements, Sports Media, and emerging Media technology. In the Analytics panel, experts from Media, Marketing, Financial Risk and Behavioural analytics shared their insights.

20+ speakers representing leading organisations like Tiger Analytics, McKinsey & Co, The World Bank, Centre for Wildlife Studies, Foreseti Consulting, Sony Sports, ArtSpire and many more, shared their insights on future trends in their area of work and shed light on the kind of skills industry will demand from young graduates.

In his opening address, Mr. Ramkumar Ramamoorthy, Pro-Vice Chancellor of Professional Learning at Krea University, said, “Last year, the World Economic Forum came out with a listing of the top 10 skills that will be needed to align oneself to the new opportunities that will be presented in the post-pandemic world by various discipline and industry segments. These include analytical thinking, active learning, problem finding, problem solving, creativity, originality and initiative, technology use, monitoring and control, resilience, stress tolerance, reasoning ideation and flexibility.

Career Dialogues, is an important endeavour by Krea University in partnership with industry, towards informing school leavers about various career options open to them, to encourage them to follow their interest and look at the world of careers more laterally than as silo tracks.

Talk on nature-based solutions for biodiversity conservation

Talk on nature-based solutions for biodiversity conservation

As part of its Environmental Studies Seminar Series, Krea University hosted a virtual knowledge session on the need for an Ecological Economic approach for Biodiversity Conservation, by Dr. Madhu Verma, Chief Economist, World Resources Institute India, New Delhi.

Dr. Madhu Verma spoke about nature-based Solutions (NBS) and nature-based / ecological infrastructure emerging as cost effective, low risk and ‘no regret’ options that provide more positive consequences than those that are engineering-based, especially with the negative impact of climate change, biodiversity loss and the need for securing livelihood security and human wellbeing.

“NBS reiterates the Sustainable Development Goals as they support vital ecosystem services, biodiversity, access to fresh water, improved livelihoods, healthy diets and food security from sustainable food systems. In the current context, NBS can also be used as a response to the COVID-19 crisis and would help ‘building forward better’. Though the usefulness of NBS is being understood, their use of values and contributions to the economic system and GDP calculus are still invisible to attract desired investments in NBS for their sustainability,” she explained.

The Krea Environmental Studies Seminar Series is a forum to share research and ongoing work in the broad domain of environmental issues and climate change. It invites speakers to explore these themes from multiple dimensions including, but not limited to, climate science, conservation, policy, culture, social movements, and more.